<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/layout/rss.xsl" media="screen"?>
<!-- generator="blogHi!/1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Progressive Minds</title>
	<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/</link>
	<description>Blogging live, from somewhere in the reality-based community. Speaking truth to power.  You've entered the real "no spin zone."

Republicans beware!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://bloghi.com/</generator>
	

	<item>
		<title>Sorry Mr. Chertoff.  Your &quot;Gut&quot; Isn't Good Enough!</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/11/sorry-mr-chertoff-your-gut-isn-t-good-enough.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/11/sorry-mr-chertoff-your-gut-isn-t-good-enough.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/11/sorry-mr-chertoff-your-gut-isn-t-good-enough.html</guid>
		<description> The Department of Homeland Security recently updated it's threat level to include Secretary Michael Chertoff's &quot;gut.&quot;
In an interview yesterday, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said he had a &quot;gut feeling&quot; about an increased risk of a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>The Department of Homeland Security recently updated it's threat level to include Secretary Michael Chertoff's "gut."</P>
<P>In an interview yesterday, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said he had a <STRONG>"gut feeling"</STRONG> about an increased risk of a terror attack here in the United States during the summer.</P>
<P>There's just one (MAJOR) catch.&nbsp; Chertoff's dire warning wasn't based on any new intelligence.&nbsp; He based his comments on his view that al Qaeda likes the summertime!&nbsp; He said <STRONG>"Summertime seems to be appealing to them. We worry that they are rebuilding their activities."</STRONG> </P>
<P>Perhaps before Mr. Chertoff goes trying to scare the American people out of their witts, warning of attacks, he should come with some actual intelligence.</P>
<P>This does nothing but reinforce for me (and many others, I'm sure) that this Administration wants to keep the American public in a perpetual state of fear and paranoia.&nbsp; And by extension, begin supporting this baseless war in Iraq.</P>
<P><STRONG><A href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/07/11/terror/main3042947.shtml">Homeland Chief: "Gut Feeling" About Attack<BR></A></STRONG></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/11/sorry-mr-chertoff-your-gut-isn-t-good-enough.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sara Taylor's Oath To Uphold George W. Bush</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/11/sara-taylor-s-oath-to-uphold-george-w-bush.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/11/sara-taylor-s-oath-to-uphold-george-w-bush.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/11/sara-taylor-s-oath-to-uphold-george-w-bush.html</guid>
		<description> So after listening to Sara Taylor appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee today, the most telling thing, for me, was this exchange between her and Sen. Patrick Leahy.Taylor: &quot;I took an oath and I take that oath to the president very...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[So after listening to Sara Taylor appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee today, the most telling thing, for me, was this exchange between her and Sen. Patrick Leahy.<BR><BR>Taylor: <B>"I took an oath and I take that oath to the president very seriously."</B><BR><BR>Sen. Leahy responded by giving Ms. Taylor a lesson from Civics 101. He reminded her that she took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States; not to uphold George W. Bush. He said: <B>"Your oath is not to uphold the president."</B> <BR><BR>We've seen this same pattern in people like Alberto Gonzales and Harriet Miers. Their loyalty for George W. Bush trumps their sense of loyalty to their country. Gonzales can't seem to remember that he no longer represents George W. Bush as his personal lawyer, but that he represents the American people now.<BR><BR>I have no problem with a President asking people they feel they can trust, to serve in their Administration. The problem arises when that person can't separate the personal from the professional, and remember that their obligation, first and foremost, is to the American public, not the President of the United States.<BR><BR>That's the problem when a bright-eyed, bushy-taled 32-year old like Sara Taylor comes to Washington to serve in a political position. They're so eager to please and prove themselves as true believers and loyalists, that sometimes they end up tossing the constitution and our nation's laws aside.<BR>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/11/sara-taylor-s-oath-to-uphold-george-w-bush.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Senate Panel Votes to Defund Cheney's Office</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/senate-panel-votes-to-defund-cheney-s-office.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/senate-panel-votes-to-defund-cheney-s-office.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/senate-panel-votes-to-defund-cheney-s-office.html</guid>
		<description> Wow.....is that a backbone I see growing in Senate Democrats?&amp;nbsp; Who knew?
A Senate panel today voted to defund Dick Cheney's office, until Cheney decides to actually abide by the law and obey an executive order on the handling of classified...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>Wow.....is that a backbone I see growing in Senate Democrats?&nbsp; Who knew?</P>
<P>A Senate panel today voted to defund Dick Cheney's office, until Cheney decides to actually abide by the law and obey an executive order on the handling of classified information.</P>
<P>From the Associated Press:</P>
<P><STRONG>Senate Democrats moved Tuesday to cut off funding for U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney's office in a continuing battle over whether he must comply with national security disclosure rules.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>A Senate appropriations panel chaired by Democratic Sen. Richard Durbin refused to fund $4.8 million in the vice president's budget until Cheney's office complies with parts of an executive order governing its handling of classified information.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>At issue is a requirement that executive branch offices provide data on how much material they classify and declassify. That information is to be provided to the Information Security Oversight Office at The National Archives.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>Cheney's office, with backing from the White House, argues that the offices of the president and vice president are exempt from the order because they are not executive branch "agencies."</STRONG></P>
<P>More at: <A href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/07/10/america/NA-GEN-US-Democrats-Cheney.php">http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/07/10/america/NA-GEN-US-Democrats-Cheney.php</A></P>
<P><FONT color=#ff0000>NOTE TO DICK CHENEY: You are not a government branch unto yourself.&nbsp; And if you want to say that you don't fall under the executive branch of our government, perhaps you shouldn't receive any funding for the Office of the Vice President, and you can live off of your salary as President of the Senate.</FONT></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/senate-panel-votes-to-defund-cheney-s-office.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The BushCo Way: Politics Before Science</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/the-bushco-way-politics-before-science.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/the-bushco-way-politics-before-science.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/the-bushco-way-politics-before-science.html</guid>
		<description> During an appearance on Capitol Hill today, former U.S. Surgeon General Richard Carmona accused his former boss of putting politics before science.&amp;nbsp; Carmona says the Bush Administration muzzled him on issues such as embryonic stem cell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>During an appearance on Capitol Hill today, former U.S. Surgeon General Richard Carmona accused his former boss of putting politics before science.&nbsp; Carmona says the Bush Administration muzzled him on issues such as embryonic stem cell research.</P>
<P>As he testified before a House committe, Carmona said:</P>
<P><STRONG>"Anything that doesn't fit into the political appointees' ideological, theological or political agenda is ignored, marginalized or simply buried."</STRONG>&nbsp; He added <STRONG>"The problem with this approach is that in public health, as in a democracy, there is nothing worse than ignoring science, or marginalizing the voice of science for reasons driven by changing political winds. The job of surgeon general is to be the doctor of the nation, not the doctor of a political party."</STRONG></P>
<P>More at: &nbsp;<A href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070710/pl_nm/bush_surgeongeneral_dc_3">http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070710/pl_nm/bush_surgeongeneral_dc_3</A></P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/the-bushco-way-politics-before-science.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Alberto Gonzales Caught Lying To Congress Again (I'm Shocked!)</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/alberto-gonzales-caught-lying-to-congress-again-i-m-shocked.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/alberto-gonzales-caught-lying-to-congress-again-i-m-shocked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/alberto-gonzales-caught-lying-to-congress-again-i-m-shocked.html</guid>
		<description> A little over two years ago, Alberto Gonzales made a trip to Capitol Hill as Congress as he lobbied for renewal of the U.S. Patriot Act.
During that time, Gonzales (the nation's top law man, no less), assured Senators that the Federal Bureau of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>A little over two years ago, Alberto Gonzales made a trip to Capitol Hill as Congress as he lobbied for renewal of the U.S. Patriot Act.</P>
<P>During that time, Gonzales (the nation's top law man, no less), assured Senators that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had NOT abused its newfound powers under the Patriot Act.&nbsp;&nbsp; He said then "There has not been one verified case of civil liberties abuse." </P>
<P>As they say on Capitol Hill, Mr. Gonzales might want to revise his previous remarks.</P>
<P>It turns out that dear old Alberto wasn't exactly being truthful when he made that statement.&nbsp; I'm just shocked, I tell you!</P>
<P>According to the Washington Post, in the three months PRIOR to his testimony, Gonzales received at least a half dozen reports of legal or procedural violations.</P>
<P>From the Post:</P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN>As he sought to renew the USA <A class=iAs style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 100%; PADDING-BOTTOM: 1px; COLOR: darkgreen; BORDER-BOTTOM: darkgreen 0.07em solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; TEXT-DECORATION: underline" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19685278/#" target=_blank itxtdid="3748427">Patriot Act</A> two years ago, <A href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Alberto+Gonzales?tid=informline">Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales</A> assured lawmakers that the FBI had not abused its potent new terrorism-fighting powers. "There has not been one verified case of civil liberties abuse," Gonzales told senators on April 27, 2005.</P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN>Six days earlier, the FBI sent Gonzales a copy of a report that said its agents had obtained personal information that they were not entitled to have. It was one of at least half a dozen reports of legal or procedural violations that Gonzales received in the three months before he made his statement to the Senate intelligence committee, according to internal FBI documents released under the Freedom of Information Act.</P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN>The acts recounted in the FBI reports included unauthorized surveillance, an illegal property search and a case in which an Internet firm improperly turned over a compact disc with data that the FBI was not entitled to collect, the documents show. Gonzales was copied on each report that said administrative rules or laws protecting civil liberties and privacy had been violated.</P>
<P class=textBodyBlack>The reports also alerted Gonzales in 2005 to problems with the FBI's use of an anti-terrorism tool known as national security letters (NSLs), well before the <A href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/U.S.+Department+of+Justice?tid=informline">Justice Department</A>'s inspector general brought widespread abuse of the letters in 2004 and 2005 to light in a stinging report this past March.</P>
<P class=textBodyBlack>More at: <A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19685278/">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19685278/</A></P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/07/10/alberto-gonzales-caught-lying-to-congress-again-i-m-shocked.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Alberto Gonzales to Monica Goodling:Wink, Wink.  Nod. Nod.  Do you remember what I remember?</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/23/alberto-gonzales-to-monica-goodling-wink-wink-nod-nod-do-you-remember-what-i-remember.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/23/alberto-gonzales-to-monica-goodling-wink-wink-nod-nod-do-you-remember-what-i-remember.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/23/alberto-gonzales-to-monica-goodling-wink-wink-nod-nod-do-you-remember-what-i-remember.html</guid>
		<description> Today Monica Goodling, a former Department of Justice official who is right smack dab in the middle of the firing of eight U.S. attorneys, testified before the House Judiciary Committe.
Goodling had been granted partial immunity.&amp;nbsp; And during...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>Today Monica Goodling, a former Department of Justice official who is right smack dab in the middle of the firing of eight U.S. attorneys, testified before the House Judiciary Committe.</P>
<P>Goodling had been granted partial immunity.&nbsp; And during her testimony, she said she became uncomfortable when, during a meeting, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales seemed to be trying to get the both of them to discuss their recollections of what happened during the purging of the attorneys.</P>
<P>From the Associated Press courtesy of MSNBC:</P>
<P><STRONG>A former Justice Department official at the center of the uproar over prosecutor firings told House investigators Wednesday that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales tried to review his story of the dismissals with her at a time when lawmakers were homing in on conflicting accounts.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>“It made me a little uncomfortable,” Monica Goodling, Gonzales’ former White House liaison, said of her conversation with the attorney general just before she took a leave of absence in March. “I just did not know if it was appropriate for us to both be discussing our recollections of what had happened.”</STRONG></P>
<P>-snip-</P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>Goodling said for the first time Wednesday that Gonzales did review the story of the firings with her at an impromptu meeting she requested in his office a few days before she took a leave of absence.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>“I was somewhat paralyzed. I was distraught, and I felt like I wanted to make a transfer,” Goodling recalled during a packed hearing of the House Judiciary Committee.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><STRONG>Gonzales, she said, indicated he would think about Goodling’s request.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>“He then proceeded to say, ‘Let me tell you what I can remember,’ and he laid out for me his general recollection ... of some of the process” of the firings, Goodling added. When Gonzales finished, “he asked me if I had any reaction to his iteration.”</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>Goodling said the conversation made her uncomfortable because she was aware that she, Gonzales and others would be called by Congress to testify.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack>It should also be noted that last month, Gonzales told the Senate Judiciary Committee that he steered clear of aides who might be called to testify about the attorney purge.&nbsp; </P>
<P class=textBodyBlack>From the AP courtesy of MSNBC:</P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>Goodling’s dramatic story about her final conversation with Gonzales brought questions from panel members about whether he had tried to align her story with his and whether he was truthful in his own congressional testimony.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>Gonzales told the Senate Judiciary Committee last month that he didn’t know the answers to some questions about the firings because he was steering clear of aides — such as Goodling — who were likely to be questioned.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>“I haven’t talked to witnesses because of the fact that I haven’t wanted to interfere with this investigation and department investigations,” Gonzales told the panel.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack>One other additional note from today's hearing: Monica Goodling admitted that she "crossed the line" (read: BROKE THE LAW) because she tood into consideration the party affiliations of candidates who were being considered for career prosecutor positions.&nbsp; </P>
<H1><FONT size=3><A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18816284/">Ex-aide says Gonzales talked about firings</A></FONT></H1>
<H2><FONT size=3><A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18816284/">Goodling also says she 'crossed the line' and that McNulty was inaccurate</A></FONT></H2>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/23/alberto-gonzales-to-monica-goodling-wink-wink-nod-nod-do-you-remember-what-i-remember.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>National Journal: Administration Withheld Emails, Re: Rove's Involvement in Getting His Protege Installed As US Attorney</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/10/national-journal-administration-withheld-emails-re-rove-s-involvement-in-getting-his-protege-installed-as-us-attorney.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/10/national-journal-administration-withheld-emails-re-rove-s-involvement-in-getting-his-protege-installed-as-us-attorney.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/10/national-journal-administration-withheld-emails-re-rove-s-involvement-in-getting-his-protege-installed-as-us-attorney.html</guid>
		<description> According to an article by Murry Waas in the National Journal, the White House and the Department of Justice worked together to conceal from Congress, Karl Rove's involvement in getting his protege Timothy Griffin installed as a U.S. attorney.
From...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>According to an article by Murry Waas in the <EM>National Journal</EM>, the White House and the Department of Justice worked together to conceal from Congress, Karl Rove's involvement in getting his protege Timothy Griffin installed as a U.S. attorney.</P>
<P>From the <EM>National Journal</EM>:</P>
<P>The Bush administration has withheld a series of e-mails from Congress showing that senior White House and Justice Department officials worked together to conceal the role of <B>Karl Rove</B> in installing <B>Timothy Griffin</B>, a protégé of Rove's, as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas. </P>
<P>The withheld records show that <B>D. Kyle Sampson</B>, who was then-chief of staff to Attorney General <B>Alberto Gonzales</B>, consulted with White House officials in drafting two letters to Congress that appear to have misrepresented the circumstances of Griffin's appointment as U.S. attorney and of Rove's role in supporting Griffin. </P>
<P><STRONG><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" color=#333366 size=4><A href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070510nj1.htm">Administration Withheld E-Mails About Rove</A> </FONT></STRONG></P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/10/national-journal-administration-withheld-emails-re-rove-s-involvement-in-getting-his-protege-installed-as-us-attorney.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Equipment Needed For Kansas Tornado Recovery Is In Iraq</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/07/equipment-needed-for-kansas-tornado-recovery-is-in-iraq.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/07/equipment-needed-for-kansas-tornado-recovery-is-in-iraq.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 20:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/07/equipment-needed-for-kansas-tornado-recovery-is-in-iraq.html</guid>
		<description> Of course one of the big news items over the weekend was the devistation in parts of Kansas due to tornados.
And the Governor of Kansas says that much of the equipment needed for the recovery effort is in Iraq.
From CNN.com:
Kansas Gov. Kathleen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>Of course one of the big news items over the weekend was the devistation in parts of Kansas due to tornados.</P>
<P>And the Governor of Kansas says that much of the equipment needed for the recovery effort is in Iraq.</P>
<P>From CNN.com:</P>
<P><STRONG>Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius expressed concern that rescue and recovery efforts were being strained because much of the needed equipment has been sent to Iraq.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>"When the troops get deployed, the equipment goes with them. So here in Kansas about 50 percent of our trucks are gone. We need trucks. We are missing Humvees, we're missing all kinds of equipment that could help us respond in this kind of emergency," she said. </STRONG></P>
<P>-snip-</P>
<P><STRONG>"National Guard are our first responders. They don't have the equipment they need to come in, and it'll just make it that much slower," she said.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>The National Guard has said for years that it is short of equipment at home because of deployments to Iraq. </STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>"We weren't fully equipped with all the resources we need before the war started," said Maj. Gen. Tod Bunting of the Kansas National Guard, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan "further depleted us."</STRONG></P>
<P>Source:&nbsp; <A href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/WEATHER/05/07/severe.weather/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2007/WEATHER/05/07/severe.weather/index.html</A></P>
<P>Thomas Frank wrote a book entitled <EM>What's The Matter With Kansas?&nbsp; How Conservatives Won The Heart of America</EM>.&nbsp; Basically, the book explores how some blue-collar workers in places like Kansas have continued to vote against their own best interests by supporting the GOP.</P>
<P>Perhaps now they will learn the importance of voting FOR their own best interests, not against.</P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/07/equipment-needed-for-kansas-tornado-recovery-is-in-iraq.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Why was Rove coaching a DOJ official on their testimony before Congress?</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/04/why-was-rove-coaching-a-doj-official-on-their-testimony-before-congress.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/04/why-was-rove-coaching-a-doj-official-on-their-testimony-before-congress.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 20:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/04/why-was-rove-coaching-a-doj-official-on-their-testimony-before-congress.html</guid>
		<description> Under no circumstances can anyone think it appropriate for Karl Rove, nothing more than Bushie's glorified political guru, to be participating in a meeting at the White House in which he coached a top DOJ official on their upcoming testimony before...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Under no circumstances can anyone think it appropriate for Karl Rove, nothing more than Bushie's glorified political guru, to be participating in a meeting at the White House in which he coached a top DOJ official on their upcoming testimony before Congress regarding the purge of U.S. attorneys. The White House is clueless if they can't see how inappropriate this is. And even more importantly, the Congress is clueless if they don't subpoena Rove ASAP and compell him to testify.<BR><BR>From <I>Newsweek</I>:<BR><BR><B>Deputy chief of staff Karl Rove participated in a hastily called meeting at the White House two months ago. The subject: The firing of eight U.S. attorneys last year. The purpose: to coach a top Justice Department official heading to Capitol Hill to testify on the prosecutorial purge on what he should say.<BR><BR>Now some investigators are saying that Rove’s attendance at the meeting shows that the president’s chief political adviser may have been involved in an attempt to mislead Congress—one more reason they are demanding to see his e-mails and force him to testify under oath.<BR><BR>At the March 5, 2007, meeting, White House aides, including counsel Fred Fielding and deputy counsel William Kelley, sought to shape testimony that Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General William Moschella was to give the next day before the House Judiciary Committee.<BR><BR>Although the existence of the White House meeting had been previously disclosed by the Justice Department, Rove’s attendance at the strategy session was not—until both Moschella and Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty talked about it in confidential testimony with congressional investigators last week. Portions of their testimony were read to NEWSWEEK by a Democratic aide who asked not to be identified talking about private matters.</B><BR><BR>Source: <A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18479265/site/newsweek" target=_blank>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18479265/site/newsweek</A> /]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/04/why-was-rove-coaching-a-doj-official-on-their-testimony-before-congress.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bush: For Exit Strategies and Timetables Before He Was Against Them</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/02/bush-for-exit-strategies-and-timetables-before-he-was-against-them.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/02/bush-for-exit-strategies-and-timetables-before-he-was-against-them.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 20:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/02/bush-for-exit-strategies-and-timetables-before-he-was-against-them.html</guid>
		<description> What a difference a few years make!&amp;nbsp; Courtesy of Political Wire, check out these quotes from George W. Bush when Bill Clinton was Commander-in-Chief.&amp;nbsp; Seems like Dear Leader has done a little flipping and flopping when it comes to exit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>What a difference a few years make!&nbsp; Courtesy of Political Wire, check out these quotes from George W. Bush when Bill Clinton was Commander-in-Chief.&nbsp; Seems like Dear Leader has done a little flipping and flopping when it comes to exit strategies and timetables.</P>
<P><STRONG><EM>"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is."<BR><BR>-- George W. Bush, 4/9/99, criticizing President Clinton for not setting a timetable for exiting Kosovo.<BR></EM></STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG><EM>"I think it's also important for the president to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn." <BR><BR>-- George W. Bush, 6/5/99</EM></STRONG></P>
<P><A href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/historical_quotes_of_the_day.html">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2007/05/01/historical_quotes_of_the_day.html</A></P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/02/bush-for-exit-strategies-and-timetables-before-he-was-against-them.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bush Vetoes Full Funding of Troops</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/02/bush-vetoes-full-funding-of-troops.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/02/bush-vetoes-full-funding-of-troops.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 19:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/02/bush-vetoes-full-funding-of-troops.html</guid>
		<description> So of course yesterday George W. Bush vetoed a bill which FULLY FUNDED our troops in Iraq.&amp;nbsp; While most of the focus has been on the portion of the bill that included a timeline for withdrawal from Iraq, it's important to remember that the bill...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>So of course yesterday George W. Bush vetoed a bill which FULLY FUNDED our troops in Iraq.&nbsp; While most of the focus has been on the portion of the bill that included a timeline for withdrawal from Iraq, it's important to remember that the bill fully funded our troops.</P>
<P>And because George W. Bush doesn't want to be held accountable for his failed war, he put our troops at risk by denying them funding.</P>
<P><A href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070502/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070502/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq</A></P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/05/02/bush-vetoes-full-funding-of-troops.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Jessica Lynch: The American people &quot;don't need to be told elaborate lies.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/24/jessica-lynch-the-american-people-don-t-need-to-be-told-elaborate-lies.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/24/jessica-lynch-the-american-people-don-t-need-to-be-told-elaborate-lies.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/24/jessica-lynch-the-american-people-don-t-need-to-be-told-elaborate-lies.html</guid>
		<description> When will the military begin leveling with the American people?&amp;nbsp; And more importantly, when will they begin leveling with the families of our fallen soldiers?
Today, an Army Ranger told the House Reform and Government Oversight Committee that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>When will the military begin leveling with the American people?&nbsp; And more importantly, when will they begin leveling with the families of our fallen soldiers?</P>
<P>Today, an Army Ranger told the House Reform and Government Oversight Committee that they were ordered to keep quiet about what really happened to Pat Tillman when he was killed in Afghanistan.&nbsp; Army Spc. Bryan O'Neal said he was also ordered not to tell Tillman's brother what happened.</P>
<P>Jessica Lynch also testifed before the Committee, and help set the record straight about what happened to her in Iraq when her convoy was ambushed.&nbsp; The military, with the media's help, embelleshed the story of Lynch's ambush, and today, Lynch said <STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000 size=4>"The bottom line is the American people are capable of determining their own ideals of heroes and they don't need to be told elaborate lies."</FONT></STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG><A href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/tillman_friendly_fire;_ylt=AmmfphNB9oIFArQ9ckNDCM.s0NUE">Ranger alleges cover-up in Tillman case</A></STRONG></P>
<H1><FONT size=3><A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18297391/site/newsweek">Setting the Record Straight</A></FONT></H1>
<H2><FONT size=3><A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18297391/site/newsweek">Jessica Lynch tells Congress what really happened to her in Iraq.</A></FONT></H2>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/24/jessica-lynch-the-american-people-don-t-need-to-be-told-elaborate-lies.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Stick to your day job, Senator McCain</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/19/stick-to-your-day-job-senator-mccain.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/19/stick-to-your-day-job-senator-mccain.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/19/stick-to-your-day-job-senator-mccain.html</guid>
		<description> John McCain's latest attempt at comedy has bombed, so to speak.
During a campaign appearance this week, McCain (who of course is running for President) joked about bombing Iran.&amp;nbsp;
From the Associated Press:
Republican presidential contender...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>John McCain's latest attempt at comedy has bombed, so to speak.</P>
<P>During a campaign appearance this week, McCain (who of course is running for President) joked about bombing Iran.&nbsp;</P>
<P>From the Associated Press:</P>
<P>Republican presidential contender John McCain, known for having a quirky sense of humor, joked about bombing Iran at a campaign appearance this week.</P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN>In response to an audience question about military action against Iran, the Arizona senator briefly sang the chorus of the surf-rocker classic “Barbara Ann.”</P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN>“That old, eh, that old Beach Boys song, Bomb Iran,” he said in jest Wednesday, chuckling with the crowd. Then, he softly sang to the melody: “Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, anyway, ah ...” The audience responded with more laughter.</P>
<P class=textBodyBlack>I guess McCain (who of course was a POW during the Vietnam War) now finds it downright funny that we might commit American's sons and daughters who wear the uniform, to a military action in Iran, putting their lives at risk.&nbsp; </P>
<P class=textBodyBlack>McCain's joke about bombing Iran, reminded me of Bush' "comedy" routine at the Radio and Television Correspondents Dinner in 2004, when he joked about not being able to find the weapons of mass distruction in Iraq, and the White House produced a video of Bush supposedly looking for Iraq's missing WMDs in the White House.&nbsp; Never mind that people have lost their lives as the result of the Iraq war.</P>
<H1><FONT size=3><A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18202742/">McCain jokes about bombing Iran</A></FONT></H1>
<H2><FONT size=3><A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18202742/">’08 GOP hopeful spoofs Beach Boys song in off-hand remark</A></FONT></H2>
<P class=textBodyBlack>&nbsp;</P>
<P class=textBodyBlack>&nbsp;</P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/19/stick-to-your-day-job-senator-mccain.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Even the Republicans took Gonzales to task today</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/19/even-the-republicans-took-gonzales-to-task-today.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/19/even-the-republicans-took-gonzales-to-task-today.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/19/even-the-republicans-took-gonzales-to-task-today.html</guid>
		<description> Suffice it to say that today was NOT a very good day for Alberto Gonzales.
When you're the Republican Attorney General of the United States,&amp;nbsp;and Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma (who's among the rightest of the right wing) tells you that you need to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>Suffice it to say that today was NOT a very good day for Alberto Gonzales.</P>
<P>When you're the Republican Attorney General of the United States,&nbsp;and Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma (who's among the rightest of the right wing) tells you that you need to pack your bags, you know you're on borrowed time.</P>
<P>Of course the big news of today is Alberto Gonzales' testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, regarding the firings of 8 U.S. prosecutors.</P>
<P>And if he was looking to members of his own party for relief, he didn't find it.</P>
<P>Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) told Gonzales it was time for him to go.&nbsp; He said <STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>"The best way to put this behind us is your resignation."</FONT></STRONG></P>
<P>Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) queried Gonzales <STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>"You said something that struck me — that sometimes it just came down to these were not the right people at the right time. If I applied that standard to you, what would you say?"</FONT></STRONG>&nbsp; </P>
<P>Ranking Member Arlen Specter (R-PA)&nbsp;warned Gonzales that his answers <STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>"did not stick together."</FONT></STRONG>&nbsp; </P>
<P>Gonzales' faulty (read: SELECTIVE) memory was of concern to Sen. Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama, who told Gonzales <STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>"I'm concerned about your recollection."</FONT></STRONG></P>
<P>Iowan Republican Sen. Charles Grassley wanted to know about Gonzales'&nbsp; inconsistent statements about his role in the firing of the prosecutors.&nbsp; He asked Gonzales <FONT color=#ff0000><STRONG>"Why is your story changing?"</STRONG>&nbsp;</FONT> (Point of privilege, if I may Senator.&nbsp; That usually happens when someone is LYING.&nbsp; Just thought I'd clarify that for you.)</P>
<P>I'm guessing that after today's hearings and Gonzales' performance, some Republican Senators are going to take that long walk to the White House and tell George W. Bush 'Game over.&nbsp; Time for your Attorney General to go.'&nbsp; And while they're at it, they might as well tell Bushie it's time for HIM to go as well.</P>
<P><STRONG><A href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070419/ap_on_go_co/gonzales_prosecutors_45">Gonzales struggles to sway skeptics</A></STRONG></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/19/even-the-republicans-took-gonzales-to-task-today.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bush White House Looking For a &quot;War Czar&quot; To Do Bush's Job</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/11/bush-white-house-looking-for-a-war-czar-to-do-bush-s-job.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/11/bush-white-house-looking-for-a-war-czar-to-do-bush-s-job.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/11/bush-white-house-looking-for-a-war-czar-to-do-bush-s-job.html</guid>
		<description> The Bush White House is seeking a &quot;war czar&quot; to oversee the war in Iraq, as well as the forgotten war in Afghanistan.
So a few things stand out for me about this:
1.&amp;nbsp; As Commander-in-Chief, isn't George W. Bush supposed to be the &quot;war...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>The Bush White House is seeking a "war czar" to oversee the war in Iraq, as well as the forgotten war in Afghanistan.</P>
<P>So a few things stand out for me about this:</P>
<P>1.&nbsp; As Commander-in-Chief, isn't George W. Bush supposed to be the "war czar?"&nbsp; That's HIS job.&nbsp; But in asking for a war czar, he's admitting that he's a miserable failure who has lost two wars, and that he needs someone to do his job for him.</P>
<P>2.&nbsp; CBS News reports that currently, there are no takers for the war czar position.&nbsp; According to a CBS report, the Washington Post says that at least three retired four-star generals were approached by the White House about the job, and they all declined to be considered for the position.&nbsp; </P>
<H2 class=headlinestory style="MARGIN-LEFT: 8px"><FONT size=3><A href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/11/the_skinny/main2670807.shtml">No Takers For Bush "War Czar"</A></FONT></H2>
<H1 class=subhead_story style="MARGIN-LEFT: 8px"><FONT size=3><A href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/11/the_skinny/main2670807.shtml">The Skinny: Top Generals Not Interested In Becoming Overseer Of U.S. War Efforts</A></FONT></H1>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/11/bush-white-house-looking-for-a-war-czar-to-do-bush-s-job.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>U.S Panel Alters Findings of Experts (re: Voter Fraud)</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/11/u-s-panel-alters-findings-of-experts-re-voter-fraud.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/11/u-s-panel-alters-findings-of-experts-re-voter-fraud.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/11/u-s-panel-alters-findings-of-experts-re-voter-fraud.html</guid>
		<description> 1.&amp;nbsp; Read how a U.S. panel is altering the finds of experts who concluded there is very little voter fraud in the United States.&amp;nbsp; From the New York Times:
A federal panel responsible for conducting election research played down the findings...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>1.&nbsp; Read how a U.S. panel is altering the finds of experts who concluded there is very little voter fraud in the United States.&nbsp; From the New York Times:</P>
<P><STRONG>A federal panel responsible for conducting election research played down the findings of experts who concluded last year that there was little voter fraud around the nation, according to a review of the original report obtained by The New York Times.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>Instead, the panel, the Election Assistance Commission, issued a report that said the pervasiveness of fraud was open to debate.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>The revised version echoes complaints made by Republican politicians, who have long suggested that voter fraud is widespread and justifies the voter identification laws that have been passed in at least two dozen states. </STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>Democrats say the threat is overstated and have opposed voter identification laws, which they say disenfranchise the poor, members of minority groups and the elderly, who are less likely to have photo IDs and are more likely to be Democrats.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>Though the original report said that among experts “there is widespread but not unanimous agreement that there is little polling place fraud,” the final version of the report released to the public concluded in its executive summary that “there is a great deal of debate on the pervasiveness of fraud.”</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG><A href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/11/washington/11voters.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1176258891-odYY6JB99KwwuYVLdZ6q/Q&amp;oref=slogin">Panel Said to Alter Finding on Voter Fraud</A></STRONG> </P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/11/u-s-panel-alters-findings-of-experts-re-voter-fraud.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bush Hires Supporter of Swift Boat Veterans for Lies; McCain Hires Richard Nixon's Jew Counter</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/04/bush-hires-supporter-of-swift-boat-veterans-for-lies-mccain-hires-richard-nixon-s-jew-counter.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/04/bush-hires-supporter-of-swift-boat-veterans-for-lies-mccain-hires-richard-nixon-s-jew-counter.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/04/bush-hires-supporter-of-swift-boat-veterans-for-lies-mccain-hires-richard-nixon-s-jew-counter.html</guid>
		<description> Some interesting reads in the news today.&amp;nbsp; 
While Congress is out of town on recess, George W. Bush used a recess appointment to name Republican fundraiser Sam Fox as U.S. ambassador to Belgium.&amp;nbsp; The interesting thing about Fox is that he...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>Some interesting reads in the news today.&nbsp; </P>
<P>While Congress is out of town on recess, George W. Bush used a recess appointment to name Republican fundraiser Sam Fox as U.S. ambassador to Belgium.&nbsp; The interesting thing about Fox is that he donated money to the so-called Swift-Boat Veterans for Truth (more accurately called the Swift Boat Veterans for Lies and More Lies).&nbsp; You will recall, of course, that the Swift Boaters were a 527 group who lied about John Kerry's service in Vietnam in order to derail his presidencial candicacy in 2004.&nbsp; The Swift Boaters did George W. Bush's bidding, while allowing Bush to try to remain above the fray as if he had no affiliation with them.&nbsp; A volunteer aide to Bush, Ken Cordier, had to quit George W. Bush's "re-election" campaign in 2004 after it was learned that he appeared in one of the Swift Boat ads.</P>
<P><STRONG><A href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/04/04/bush.ambassador.ap/index.html">Swift Boat donor's appointment sidesteps Congress</A></STRONG></P>
<P>Meanwhile, Senator and Presidential aspirant John McCain has hired Richard Nixon's "Jew Counter" to help him with his campaign.</P>
<P>In a press release, the McCain campaign announced that it has hired Fred Malek to serve as its national finance co-chair.&nbsp;&nbsp; Malek has a very interesting history indeed.&nbsp; He served as a "Jew Counter" for Richard Nixon.&nbsp; Nixon complained about a so-called "Jewish cabal" within the Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics.&nbsp; Paranoid Nixon believed that the "Jewish cabal" in the Bureau of Labor Statistics, was skewering data to make his Administration look bad.&nbsp; So he asked Fred Malek (yes, the very same Fred Malek that McCain has just hired) to go back and count the number of Jews in the Bureau of Labor Statistics.&nbsp; Malek reported back the number of Jews to the Nixon White House.</P>
<H1 class=blg_hdln_rd><FONT size=3><A href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?bid=3&amp;pid=181707">John McCain and the Jew-Counter</A></FONT></H1>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/04/04/bush-hires-supporter-of-swift-boat-veterans-for-lies-mccain-hires-richard-nixon-s-jew-counter.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Newt Gingrich Equates Bilingual Education With The &quot;Language of Living in a Ghetto&quot;</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/31/newt-gingrich-equates-bilingual-education-with-the-language-of-living-in-a-ghetto.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/31/newt-gingrich-equates-bilingual-education-with-the-language-of-living-in-a-ghetto.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/31/newt-gingrich-equates-bilingual-education-with-the-language-of-living-in-a-ghetto.html</guid>
		<description> Before a crowd of 100 people today (boy, he sure knows how to draw a crowd!), Newt Gingrich equated bilingual education with the &quot;language of living in a ghetto.&quot;
No commentary from me necessary....I'll just let Newt's bigoted words speak for...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>Before a crowd of 100 people today (boy, he sure knows how to draw a crowd!), Newt Gingrich equated bilingual education with the "language of living in a ghetto."</P>
<P>No commentary from me necessary....I'll just let Newt's bigoted words speak for themself.</P>
<P>From an Associated Press article:</P>
<P><STRONG>Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich equated bilingual education Saturday with "the language of living in a ghetto" and mocked requirements that ballots be printed in multiple languages. </STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>"The government should quit mandating that various documents be printed in any one of 700 languages depending on who randomly shows up" to vote, said Gingrich, who is considering seeking the Republican presidential nomination in 2008. He made the comments in a speech to the National Federation of Republican Women.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG>"The American people believe English should be the official language of the government. ... We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the common language of the country and they learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in a ghetto," Gingrich said to cheers from the crowd of more than 100.</STRONG></P>
<P><STRONG><A href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070331/ap_on_re_us/gingrich2008">Gingrich decries bilingual ballots</A></STRONG> </P>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/31/newt-gingrich-equates-bilingual-education-with-the-language-of-living-in-a-ghetto.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bush Says Gonzales is &quot;Honorable and Honest;&quot; I say Bush is out of touch with reality</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/31/bush-says-gonzales-is-honorable-and-honest-i-say-bush-is-out-of-touch-with-reality.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/31/bush-says-gonzales-is-honorable-and-honest-i-say-bush-is-out-of-touch-with-reality.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/31/bush-says-gonzales-is-honorable-and-honest-i-say-bush-is-out-of-touch-with-reality.html</guid>
		<description> So today, Bush said that Alberto Gonzales is &quot;honorable and honest.&quot; Dear Leader commented &quot;He is providing documents for Congress to find the truth. He will testify in front of Congress. And he will tell the truth. I will remind you there is no...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[So today, Bush said that Alberto Gonzales is "honorable and honest." <BR><BR>Dear Leader commented "He is providing documents for Congress to find the truth. He will testify in front of Congress. And he will tell the truth. I will remind you there is no credible evidence there has been any wrongdoing." (<A href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070401/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/fired_prosecutors;_ylt=AsB8uWdbd55TTsbDSBnRpp6s0NUE">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070401/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/fired_prosecutors;_ylt=AsB8uWdbd55TTsbDSBnRpp6s0NUE</A>)<BR><BR>So let me see if I've got this straight.<BR><BR>The very same man that helped Bush keep his DUI arrest quiet, when Bush was called for jury duty while Governor of Texas. That man is "honorable and honest" in Bush's opinion.<BR><BR>The very same man who failed to provide Bush with critical information (such as ineffective counsel, mitigating evidence, and actual evidence of a person's innocence) when Bush had to decide on clemency petitions as Governor of Texas. That man is "honorable and honest" in Bush's opinion.<BR><BR>The man who has lied about the depth of his role in the firing of 8 prosecutors for seemingly purely political reasons. That man is "honorable and honest" in Bush's opinion.<BR><BR>Refreshing, isn't it, that Dear Leader has clarified for us, what he defines as being "honorable and honest."]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/31/bush-says-gonzales-is-honorable-and-honest-i-say-bush-is-out-of-touch-with-reality.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kyle Sampson Says He Suggested Firing CIA Leak Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-says-he-suggested-firing-cia-leak-prosecutor-patrick-fitzgerald.html</link>
		<comments>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-says-he-suggested-firing-cia-leak-prosecutor-patrick-fitzgerald.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-says-he-suggested-firing-cia-leak-prosecutor-patrick-fitzgerald.html</guid>
		<description> Kyle Sampson, former Chief of Staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, testifed before Congress today that during a meeting with then White House Counsel Harriet Miers,&amp;nbsp;he suggested&amp;nbsp;that they consider firing prosecutor Patrick...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>Kyle Sampson, former Chief of Staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, testifed before Congress today that during a meeting with then White House Counsel Harriet Miers,&nbsp;he suggested&nbsp;that they consider firing prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, who of course was the prosecutor in the CIA Leak Case, and successful prosecuted&nbsp;Scooter Libby for his role in the case.</P>
<P>But Sampson told Congress that he wasn't really serious in suggesting the removal of Fitzgerald.&nbsp; He says maybe he did it to see what kind of reaction&nbsp;it would get!&nbsp; (Spare me!&nbsp; Can this guy be any more of a joke?)</P>
<P>From MSNBC:</P>
<P><STRONG>D. Kyle Sampson, the former top aide to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, said in </STRONG><A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17852146/"><STRONG>testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee</STRONG></A><STRONG> Thursday that he suggested removing prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, who oversaw the CIA leak case involving White House staff, from his post.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>Sampson said he made the recommendation during a White House meeting with Harriet Miers, former counsel to President Bush.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>Sampson's statements on Thursday came amid controversy over U.S. attorneys who were fired without warning. His testimony for the first time put Gonzales at the heart of the firings amid ever-changing Justice Department accounts of how they were planned.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><STRONG>Miers and her deputy, William Kelley. "I remember on one occasion in 2006 in discussing the removal of U.S. attorneys ... and I raised Pat Fitzgerald."&nbsp; Sampson said that as soon as he raised Fitzgerald at the meeting he regretted it: "I knew that it was the wrong thing to do. I knew that it was inappropriate."</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>Fitzgerald served as special counsel in the trial over who revealed the identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame, which ended in a perjury and obstruction conviction for Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Wilson is the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>When quizzed by Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., how Miers and Kelly reacted to the suggestion that Fitzgerald be added to the list of U.S. attorneys slated to be fired, Sampson said, "They looked at me like I had said something totally inappropriate, and I had." </STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>"Why did you say it?&nbsp; Why did you recommend or at least suggest that he be removed as U.S. attorney?" Durbin asked.</STRONG></P>
<P class=textBodyBlack><SPAN id=byLine></SPAN><STRONG>Sampson said he wasn't sure, but he thought "it was maybe to get a reaction from them." He added that he "never seriously considered" putting Fitzgerald on a list and that Fitzgerald never appeared on any list.</STRONG></P>
<H1><A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17861616/">CIA leak prosecutor’s job was threatened</A></H1>
<H2><A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17861616/">Ex-Gonzales aide says in testimony he suggested removing Fitzgerald</A></H2>]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-says-he-suggested-firing-cia-leak-prosecutor-patrick-fitzgerald.html#comments</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>